CRISP Security Shield Logo

Compliance Risk &

Information Security Partners

Introducing the new small business third-party risk management company

06-F: Compliance

This section evaluates how your organization identifies, understands, and complies with applicable laws, regulations, industry standards, and contractual obligations.

The questions focus on whether you have defined accountability for compliance, processes to track and implement regulatory changes, and controls to meet requirements related to cybersecurity, privacy, data protection, and record retention. They also confirm that you perform periodic reviews, assessments, or audits to verify ongoing compliance and address gaps in a structured way.

Explanation: Compliance with legal and regulatory standards ensures that the vendor operates within the necessary frameworks to protect sensitive data and mitigate risks.

Risks of Incorrect Answer:

Non-compliance may result in fines, legal action, or reputational damage.

Data security and privacy measures may not meet minimum industry requirements, exposing client data to risks.

Applicable Frameworks:

GDPR (Art. 5, 32): Covers data protection principles and security requirements.

GLBA: Regulates the security of financial data.

PCI DSS: Mandates security measures for handling payment card data.

SOX: Requires robust financial data security controls.''

Explanation:

An internal team focused on audit and compliance ensures continuous monitoring and quick resolution of risks and regulatory challenges.

Risks of Incorrect Answer:

Unaddressed compliance gaps may lead to regulatory violations.

Security risks may remain undetected without dedicated oversight.

Applicable Frameworks:

ISO 27001 (A.18.1.1): Requires identification of applicable legal, statutory, and regulatory requirements.

NIST CSF (ID.GV-1): Ensures cybersecurity governance, including dedicated roles for managing compliance and risks.''

Explanation:

Independent audits validate a vendor’s compliance with security standards and provide an objective assessment of their security posture.

Risks of Incorrect Answer:

Lack of independent verification may indicate gaps in compliance or security practices.

Unidentified high-risk issues could pose significant threats to client data.

Applicable Frameworks:

SOC 2: Requires independent audits to assess controls related to security, availability, and confidentiality.

ISO 27001 (A.18.2.3): Recommends independent review of information security controls.

PCI DSS (12.8.4): Mandates service providers to undergo regular audits.

CRISP Secrity Logo

​Compliance Risk &

Information Security
Partners

CRISP

Empowering small businesses
with BIG Solutions

Some or all of the services described in this engagement may not be available to certain clients, including those who have affiliations or relationships with audit firms or related entities.

The information provided herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the specific circumstances of any individual or entity. While we strive to offer accurate and up-to-date information, we cannot guarantee its accuracy at the time it is received or in the future. No action should be taken based solely on this information without seeking appropriate professional advice tailored to your particular situation. CRISP does not provide legal or tax advice.

This information is not intended to constitute “written advice concerning one or more Federal tax matters” as defined by section 10.37(a)(2) of Treasury Department Circular 230.

Contact Us

Let’s discuss your unique security needs and address any other questions you may have. Contact us today for a free consultation and take the next step towards strengthening your company’s defenses.

LEGAL POLICIES

Privacy Policy

Terms & Conditions

Disclaimer

Cookie Policy

DSAR

Refunds/Returns

Shipping Policy

EULA

Message

© 2025 Compliance Risk & Information Security Partners (CRISP). All rights reserved.